Adam Rusted

I'm seeing that SimilarWeb are hard pushing their account system. You can (at least for now) bypass it using the below format: `https://similarweb.com/website/google.com/#overview` Replacing Google.com with the domain you're wanting...

Similarweb Rank: [687,150](https://www.similarweb.com/website/jooq.org/#overview) On this metric alone, it would be out of scope for this project. Do you have another metric we could use?

Quite the opposite. We require a brand to have a SimilarWeb rank of [500,000 or lower](https://github.com/simple-icons/simple-icons/blob/develop/CONTRIBUTING.md#requesting-an-icon) in order to add them - unless another of our accepted metrics is met.

Now the new metrics have been finalised: SimilarWeb Rank: Global: [562,381](https://www.similarweb.com/website/jooq.org/) Country (USA): 381,800 Category (in USA): 6,393 Download Stats: As @SimoneGiusso mentioned, it's available on [Maven Repository](https://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.jooq/jooq), showing 1,180th...

As per @PeterShaggyNoble's comments - I'm going to close this one as https://github.com/simple-icons/simple-icons/labels/out%20of%20scope. Feel free to re-open it if it does come into scope, @SimoneGiusso.

Their terms specifically say you need permission to include them. Regardless of whether or not we think they'll send a take-down, we _should_ obtain permission before continuing to have them...

> This PR is ruining our collection. It's a heavy blow, for sure - however we should've historically identified the need to ask for consent. The fact we did not...

I think we need to refer to [the threshold of originality](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Threshold_of_originality) where possible, and potentially adapt something similar (officially) ourselves. I would argue, given we're not restricted to one territory...

Internet Explorer is already on the list ;)

@service-paradis