Adam Rodger

Closed as stale since the release of PactNet 4.x

I'm not sure we're planning on doing any more Ruby-based releases (3.x and below) in favour of Rust-based releases (4.x and above) so not sure if this will get done.

Yeah I'd close it. I doubt it's gonna get done On Fri, 29 Apr 2022, 15:44 Yousaf Nabi, ***@***.***> wrote: > Should we close this down @bethesque > @adamrodger sounds...

Closed as stale since the release of PactNet 4.x

I'm not seeing `ProviderState` type support in the v3 specification? https://github.com/pact-foundation/pact-specification/tree/version-3#introduce-example-generators The table there doesn't list `ProviderState` as an option, and this MR doesn't introduce any of the other options.

The spec is a bit of a mess here tbh - only the v4 spec mentions `ProviderState` as a possible generator type, but says it's supported in v3, even though...

That sounds like a gap in the spec to me though. By mentioning certain generators and not mentioning that it's extensible, it's totally logical to expect that that's a definitive...

I don't fully understand the feature request if I'm honest. It would be really helpful if you could create a proposal for the API changes with an explanation of what...

We've had other instances unfortunately where the core libs behave differently across different OSs, and one case where the Linux lib just completely crashed with no output or anything. That's...

Merging this in order to include arm64 support in the next release as a beta, although it won't be officially supported until we can run CI against it due to...