Adam Farley

Good catch Jie. :) Looks like the fix [here](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk/commit/1ed4c8394859f6c36e165c4f59a6b5c9fbd793ee) was associated with the issue [here](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8021775). It was meant to be backported to JDK8, but got deferred and forgotten. Will exclude...

Master exclusion: https://github.com/adoptium/aqa-tests/pull/5228 Will be cherry picked and merged into latest release branch once approved+merged. (Update: Done [here](https://github.com/adoptium/aqa-tests/pull/5229)) After the release, the fix for this will be backported in Q2...

Upstream bug raised here: https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8330973 Upstream PR raised here: https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u-dev/pull/487

Severin has asked for a backport of the full JDK9 fix, rather than the minimal version, so I'm checking the backport to make sure it's clean.

Looking into the creation of the backport PR now. Commit generated [here](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u-dev/commit/7a269c7d89c6c4781f194548dc723818a456411d). Testing underway. Links to follow. https://ci.adoptium.net/job/Grinder/9898/console Note: May need re-launching if the relative test path is incorrect.

Resuming this task. Here's a grinder rerun: https://ci.adoptium.net/job/Grinder/10554/ Update: Test run passed. Creating [upstream PR](https://github.com/openjdk/jdk8u-dev/pull/545) and updating the [associated bug](https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8330973).

Update: The upstream PR has been merged into jdk8u dev. Will unexclude this test once the change gets merged into jdk8u.

To achieve the aggregate view in the image above, here's a task breakdown of what needs to be done (WIP). If something has already been done, or is being done...

The Action Plan above was based on two principles: - These functionalities are, I believe, necessary to achieve the dashboard image above. and - These functionalities are to be investigated,...

I agree. Perhaps the job status could be "aborted" due to timeout, and "failed" if no nodes exist?