refactor: Replace `ParticleSmearing` with `TrackParameterSmearing ` in Examples
- output true track parameters from particle generator
- replace
ParticleSmearingwithTrackParameterSmearingwhich can be applied in a wider range
📊: Physics performance monitoring for 4f5daa0fbe5e1fe8a0aefa2e998455bc6db118cf
physmon summary
- ✅ Particles fatras
- ✅ Particles geant4
- ✅ Particles ttbar
- ✅ Vertices ttbar
- ✅ Truth tracking (KF)
- ✅ Truth tracking (GSF)
- ✅ Truth tracking (GX2F)
- ✅ Truth tracking (KF refit)
- ✅ Truth tracking (GSF refit)
- ✅ CKF finding performance | trackfinding | single muon | truth smeared seeding
- ✅ CKF fitting performance | trackfinding | single muon | truth smeared seeding
- ✅ CKF track summary | trackfinding | single muon | truth smeared seeding
- ✅ Seeding trackfinding | single muon | truth estimated seeding
- ✅ CKF finding performance | trackfinding | single muon | truth estimated seeding
- ✅ CKF fitting performance | trackfinding | single muon | truth estimated seeding
- ✅ CKF track summary | trackfinding | single muon | truth estimated seeding
- ✅ Seeding trackfinding | single muon | default seeding
- ✅ CKF finding performance | trackfinding | single muon | default seeding
- ✅ CKF fitting performance | trackfinding | single muon | default seeding
- ✅ CKF track summary | trackfinding | single muon | default seeding
- ✅ Seeding trackfinding | single muon | orthogonal seeding
- ✅ CKF finding performance | trackfinding | single muon | orthogonal seeding
- ✅ CKF fitting performance | trackfinding | single muon | orthogonal seeding
- ✅ CKF track summary | trackfinding | single muon | orthogonal seeding
- ✅ Seeding trackfinding | 4 muon x 50 vertices | default seeding
- ✅ CKF finding performance | trackfinding | 4 muon x 50 vertices | default seeding
- ✅ CKF fitting performance | trackfinding | 4 muon x 50 vertices | default seeding
- ✅ CKF track summary | trackfinding | 4 muon x 50 vertices | default seeding
- ✅ Ambisolver finding performance | trackfinding | 4 muon x 50 vertices | default seeding
- ✅ IVF notime | trackfinding | 4 muon x 50 vertices | default seeding
- ✅ AMVF gauss notime | trackfinding | 4 muon x 50 vertices | default seeding
- ✅ AMVF grid time | trackfinding | 4 muon x 50 vertices | default seeding
- ✅ Seeding trackfinding | ttbar with 200 pileup | default seeding
- ✅ CKF finding performance | trackfinding | ttbar with 200 pileup | default seeding
- ✅ CKF fitting performance | trackfinding | ttbar with 200 pileup | default seeding
- ✅ CKF track summary | trackfinding | ttbar with 200 pileup | default seeding
- ✅ Ambisolver finding performance | trackfinding | ttbar with 200 pileup | default seeding
- ✅ AMVF gauss notime | trackfinding | ttbar with 200 pileup | default seeding
- ✅ AMVF grid time | trackfinding | ttbar with 200 pileup | default seeding
I think smearing track parameters is more general than smearing particles to tracks. I enabled the generator to distribute true track parameters which can also be used for other stuff than smearing. I saw a couple of times that we disable the smearing with 0 sigmas which can now be purely handled by the generator.
Actually to make this work correctly I have to extract the track parameters from particles in a different spot. Right now the track parameters and truth proto tracks do not reliably align anymore. To solve it it makes more sense to have a separate extraction algorithm I believe.
## Walkthrough
Focus on the changes, we must. Renaming and restructuring parameters related to particle tracking configurations, these changes do. The `ParticleSmearingSigmas` class, now `TrackSmearingSigmas`, renamed it is. Parameters updated, they are, from `d0`, `d0PtA`, and others, to `loc0`, `loc0PtA`, and more. New classes for extracting and smearing track parameters introduced, while the `ParticleSmearing` class removed it is. Clarity and consistency in the codebase enhanced, yes.
## Changes
| File | Change Summary |
|------|----------------|
| `CI/physmon/workflows/physmon_trackfinding_1muon.py` | Renamed `ParticleSmearingSigmas` to `TrackSmearingSigmas` and updated parameters from `d0`, `d0PtA`, etc., to `loc0`, `loc0PtA`, etc. |
| `Examples/Algorithms/Generators/ActsExamples/Generators/EventGenerator.cpp` | Removed namespace prefix `ActsExamples::` from class and method signatures, updated include directives. |
| `Examples/Algorithms/Generators/ActsExamples/Generators/EventGenerator.hpp` | Removed unused header `<functional>`, updated comment for `outputVertices` in `Config` struct. |
| `Examples/Algorithms/TruthTracking/ActsExamples/TruthTracking/ParticleSmearing.cpp` | Deleted file, removed `ParticleSmearing` class and its methods. |
| `Examples/Algorithms/TruthTracking/ActsExamples/TruthTracking/ParticleTrackParamExtractor.cpp` | Added `ParticleTrackParamExtractor` class with methods for extracting track parameters. |
| `Examples/Algorithms/TruthTracking/ActsExamples/TruthTracking/ParticleTrackParamExtractor.hpp` | Introduced `ParticleTrackParamExtractor` class and `Config` struct for track parameter extraction. |
| `Examples/Algorithms/TruthTracking/ActsExamples/TruthTracking/TrackParameterSmearing.cpp` | Added `TrackParameterSmearing` class for smearing track parameters based on configuration. |
| `Examples/Algorithms/TruthTracking/ActsExamples/TruthTracking/TrackParameterSmearing.hpp` | Renamed class from `ParticleSmearing` to `TrackParameterSmearing`, updated `Config` struct parameters. |
| `Examples/Algorithms/TruthTracking/CMakeLists.txt` | Removed `ParticleSmearing.cpp`, added `ParticleTrackParamExtractor.cpp` and `TrackParameterSmearing.cpp`. |
| `Examples/Python/python/acts/examples/reconstruction.py` | Replaced `ParticleSmearingSigmas` with `TrackSmearingSigmas`, updated function signatures. |
| `Examples/Python/src/Generators.cpp` | Added multiple generator classes and refined generator exposure to Python. |
| `Examples/Python/src/TruthTracking.cpp` | Replaced `ParticleSmearing` with `ParticleTrackParamExtractor`, updated parameters. |
| `Examples/Python/tests/conftest.py` | Updated `basic_prop_seq` fixture to use `ParticleTrackParamExtractor`, modified logging levels. |
| `Examples/Python/tests/test_algorithms.py` | Renamed module from `ParticleSmearing` to `TrackParameterSmearing`. |
| `Examples/Python/tests/test_propagation.py` | Updated tests to replace particle smearing with track parameter extraction. |
| `Examples/Scripts/Optimization/ckf.py` | Renamed `ParticleSmearingSigmas` to `TrackSmearingSigmas`, updated parameters. |
| `Examples/Scripts/Python/ckf_tracks.py` | Renamed `ParticleSmearingSigmas` to `TrackSmearingSigmas`, updated parameters. |
| `Examples/Scripts/Python/material_validation.py` | Replaced `ParticleSmearing` with `ParticleTrackParamExtractor`, updated parameters. |
| `Examples/Scripts/Python/material_validation_itk.py` | Added parameters for dynamic configuration, updated extractor instantiation. |
| `Examples/Scripts/Python/propagation.py` | Replaced `ParticleSmearing` with `ParticleTrackParamExtractor`, updated parameters. |
| `Examples/Scripts/Python/vertex_fitting.py` | Updated to use `TrackParameterSmearing` and `ParticleTrackParamExtractor`. |
| `Examples/Scripts/Python/full_chain_test.py` | Updated argument parsing and handling of particle tracking and reconstruction. |
## Possibly related PRs
- **#3836**: Changes related to renaming `ParticleSmearingSigmas` to `TrackSmearingSigmas` are connected to modifications in the `HitSelector` class, enhancing the tracking process.
- **#3886**: This PR modifies the `RootTrackSummaryWriter` to function without truth information, which aligns with the broader context of handling track parameters and configurations in the main PR.
## Suggested labels
`automerge`
> "In code we trust, with names anew,
> Track smearing sigmas, clear and true.
> From particles to tracks, we now align,
> With parameters refined, our paths entwine.
> New classes emerge, old ones depart,
> In the realm of code, we play our part!" 🎉
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?
🪧 Tips
Chat
There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
- Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.Generate unit testing code for this file.Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
- Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:@coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.@coderabbitai modularize this function.
- PR comments: Tag
@coderabbitaiin a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:@coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.@coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.@coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.@coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.
CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
@coderabbitai pauseto pause the reviews on a PR.@coderabbitai resumeto resume the paused reviews.@coderabbitai reviewto trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.@coderabbitai full reviewto do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.@coderabbitai summaryto regenerate the summary of the PR.@coderabbitai resolveresolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.@coderabbitai configurationto show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.@coderabbitai helpto get help.
Other keywords and placeholders
- Add
@coderabbitai ignoreanywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed. - Add
@coderabbitai summaryto generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description. - Add
@coderabbitaianywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.
CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)
- You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a
.coderabbit.yamlfile to the root of your repository. - Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
- If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation:
# yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json
Documentation and Community
- Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
- Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
- Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Output changes are expected because the p / q/p calculations change slightly.
I had a look at the sonar issues. I would prefer the explicit type for the distributions over using std defaults. The override thing looks very minor. I would prefer to sweep that out in one go.
Quality Gate passed
Issues
2 New issues
0 Accepted issues
Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code