Updates to PRs linked to an issue should clear the stale attribute

[jsoref]

The problem

1. actions/stale said an issue was stale https://github.com/primer/view_components/issues/1033#issuecomment-1229120056 and marked it as stale https://github.com/primer/view_components/issues/1033#event-7271587943
2. I made a PR that would close the issue https://github.com/primer/view_components/issues/1033#ref-pullrequest-1353408921
3. The bot did not remove its stale marker
4. I had to add an extra comment to the issue: https://github.com/primer/view_components/issues/1033#issuecomment-1230436001

The solution

Ideally the bot should be able to recognize that a PR exists and is linked to the issue and remove the stale annotation. As stale-bot runs on a schedule, it can have access to pull requests and can therefore check to see if there are stale-issues with linked PRs and then check to see if those PRs have been touched since it last ran, and then remove the stale notice.

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days

[jsoref]

👎

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days

[jsoref]

👎

[github-actions[bot]]

This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days

[jsoref]

👎

[bilderbuchi]

In a similar vein, issue that have an open PR linked to them (like https://github.com/conda/conda-build/issues/3170) should not be marked stale at all, imo. Otherwise, stale bot would close an issue that has a PR currently waiting that closes it. If anything, the linked PR should be checked for staleness, as that has become the "upstream" datum of information concerning the issue in question.

[dorner]

I'm kind of shocked that this isn't the default behavior. I switched to this action because I assumed it was. :frowning_face: In general if an issue has a linked PR, and that PR is active, that should be enough to keep the issue itself "alive".