Aaron Crosman

Proposed solution in #229

Honest reviews are useful even when they are warning people away. We just don't get into needless product trashing.

This needs to be discussed as potentially a use case in documentation most likely. Potentially can be closed as moot because of Snowfakery.

We should probably close this PR and open a replacement against the new repo. @kschaefges do you mind doing that?

This can be worked on as a UI to wrap Snowfakery/CCI. There are some [ideas from the fall of 2019 in the project wiki.](https://github.com/SFDO-Community-Sprints/DataGenerationToolkit/wiki/Data-Generation-Tool-UI-UX-Ideas) Eventually this issue is likely to...

This needs to be discussed as potentially a use case in documentation most likely. Potentially can be closed as moot because of Snowfakery.

Snowfakery, and some other tools, can do this well right now, but lack examples and documentation to make it easy even for an expert to generate the data. Likely this...

We have talked in past about being open to recipes for harder to test packages like Admissions Connect, Subledger, and Student Success Hub (all of which require additional licenses for...

The other fields to be careful of are things that appear in developer orgs but not all production orgs. We ran into this with some early recipes that tried to...

When it came up it the scratch orgs in use had no additional licenses enabled. They just had more features enabled by default than expected. I think having the standard...