EmpiricalStandards icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
EmpiricalStandards copied to clipboard

Tools and standards for conducting and evaluating research in software engineering

Results 36 EmpiricalStandards issues
Sort by recently updated
recently updated
newest added

Supplementary materials heading added

The systematic review standard should be divided into at least three standards for meta-analysis, case survey, critical review, meta-synthesis. Somewhere we need to explain that ad hoc reviews, rapid reviews...

documentation
Epic Story

In definition? Title? What's the best way to do this?

documentation

Clarify that structured interviews are methodologically equivalent to questionnaire surveys.

documentation

As a checklist user, I want the essential attributes to be organized by where they typically appear in papers rather than by the standard they're drawn from So I don't...

OnePhaseReviewerChecklist
AuthorChecklist
TwoPhaseReviewerChecklist

https://openreview.net/ has an open API, which might be easier to work with than HotCRP or Easychair.

Epic Story

Create a flow chart or decision tree to help users determine which standard(s) to select. (Suggestions welcome).

documentation

@drpaulralph says: Please clean up the bibliography entries for the suggested readings and exemplars, and put them all in ACM style. But the refs seem fine to me.

documentation
good first issue
datascience

We need some kind of recommendations for reviewing a method for which there is no existing standard, such that a reviewer can click "other" in the reviewer checklist generator and...

documentation