EmpiricalStandards
EmpiricalStandards copied to clipboard
Tools and standards for conducting and evaluating research in software engineering
Supplementary materials heading added
The systematic review standard should be divided into at least three standards for meta-analysis, case survey, critical review, meta-synthesis. Somewhere we need to explain that ad hoc reviews, rapid reviews...
In definition? Title? What's the best way to do this?
Clarify that structured interviews are methodologically equivalent to questionnaire surveys.
As a checklist user, I want the essential attributes to be organized by where they typically appear in papers rather than by the standard they're drawn from So I don't...
https://openreview.net/ has an open API, which might be easier to work with than HotCRP or Easychair.
Create a flow chart or decision tree to help users determine which standard(s) to select. (Suggestions welcome).
@drpaulralph says: Please clean up the bibliography entries for the suggested readings and exemplars, and put them all in ACM style. But the refs seem fine to me.
We need some kind of recommendations for reviewing a method for which there is no existing standard, such that a reviewer can click "other" in the reviewer checklist generator and...