Alexander Chernyakevich

It could resolve #2126, #2105, #1996, #1721. Potentially it could resolve #2084, #1730.

Another one issue that could be potentially resolved: #1741

Another one issue that could be potentially resolved: #2263, #2320

@maxxcrawford or @groovecoder Maybe you could pay attentions to this issue, mark it by enhancement label and put to development plans? :)

> **For the better UI/UX** I'd suggest adding **all** the icons of the existing containers, prioritizing the current one by making it a leftmost one and having a checkbox to...

> > I'm not sure it would be a good idea. List of configured container could be very long (in some issues I have seen refereces that people had 40+...

> > bad idea to add `accounts.google.com` site to any container's site list > > tbh I'm not sure it's relevant here either, might make sense to create a separate...

@dannycolin Looks like next week I will have free one of my developers familiar with Firefox Add-Ons development. Will it be ok if we will start implementation of new Confirmation...

> @achernyakevich-sc `Open in Current container and forget about assigned container` would need to be set per container, right? As I can imaging **currently** MAC has the following implementation: *...

Sorry, "destroying" is bad word. In reality it is exactly "unassignment". So I would agree that your label is matching better for the actions that will happen. :)