叶芝秋
叶芝秋
The type and value should be evaluated separately, that is, a normal expression should not have a type as an argument, except as an annotation that indicates the type of...
And there some other problem, see the following comparison. # GitHub ```hs data Node = Node Int Node Node | Leaf isLeaf, isNode :: Node -> Bool isNode (Node value...
> In order to highlight constructor definitions a dedicated context needs to pushed on stack, but how to know `isLeaf` not being a type variable with more type expression terms...
> There are several situations Github's and all those other TextMate syntaxes' highlighting fails, too, especially if expressions like types use several lines. It's actually not that easy to fail....
我也觉得应该如此
There are some problem In The release version. Please install the latest edition of this plugin by hand, then try It again.
I don't really understand what's your mean, I suggest you to change the key binding manually.
> Aha, It's a bug of RB. **syntax specific color schemes** are not currently considered.
@themilkman The latest version of the mater branch should fix this issue, can you give it a try?
@themilkman Can you provide a larger screenshot?