abrensch
abrensch
> OK, I saw it. And will start with that. But in the next few weeks my time is a bit limited. Sorry, assignig to you was just by accident....
I created a merge request for my patch: https://github.com/abrensch/brouter/pull/573
> Would the "second level" catch this? No. I thought about detecting such assigned variables that are effectively unused, but that's difficult because there's also this remote access from the...
Hi Lucas, I agree with your analysis. However, it should be fixed in the access-logic, niot in the highway penalties. If the bike-"defaultaccess" for footway would be false, then the...
There's also a feature called "timeout-free recalculations": when a request timed out, start the BRouter-App, and you should see a "" option in the waypoint-selection. When you choose that, and...
I had some thoughts on conditional restrictions a while ago: https://github.com/abrensch/brouter/issues/193 however, that's the general case including intraday-changes conditions on a seasonal timeline could be processed at the preprocessor-level, which...
> perhaps you can reuse the programm used by Arndt for "estimated_traffic_class" OsmTrafficMap.java? estimated_traffic_class is injected in the "WayLinker" step, the very last step of preprocessing, but the first step...
> So if you have a preprocessor that generates pseudo-tags connected to the osm-way-id, > then that' proabably the best location to inject them. sorry if you have your data...
If you do that without being prepared for the hard way of really doing responsive Design, then this will Just Produce Bug Reports..
>> When zooming any UI part (e.g. Ctrl+Scroll over navbar, status bar, sidebar), >> the map is scaled up already, along with fonts. Would that be enough? hey, really, that...