Austin Bonander
Austin Bonander
But you mentioned "bigdecimal" a couple of times. Was that a mistake?
I already have a similar change in https://github.com/launchbadge/sqlx/pull/3383/files#diff-93b9b9f2d9c2f7fe607f3fca79da6def6664450fe4105f0f3d1c3478fd5d2a32R160
@joeydewaal merge conflicts here.
`try_recv()` only drains the buffer, it does not add to it. If it reads a notification, it returns it directly. The buffer exists because the server may send notifications at...
Now that I think about this more, if you actually _want_ it to try reading from the socket and just not wait, you would just use `.try_recv().now_or_never()`: https://docs.rs/futures/latest/futures/future/trait.FutureExt.html#method.now_or_never I would...
Before long, I want to make a significant refactor to the driver code that runs the connection state machine in its own task. Then, it will always eagerly read notifications...
Please provide the relevant database schema as well as the output of `EXPLAIN (VERBOSE, FORMAT JSON) `
Tentatively closed by #3541
I'd recommend considering the rollup feature requested in #9355 as well, as the confirmation is nice and can help catch something like a leaked publish token. It's just the _number_...
It adds a new type parameter to public methods, which would break UFCS calls.