Anthony Blaom, PhD
Anthony Blaom, PhD
I'm not yet too familiar with this package but I feel that `scalar * measure` should keep its current meaning, the most natural in the context of general measures. Whatever...
> At the same time, we want people to use the package, and most new users will already be familiar with Distributions. And certainly any conflicts with Distributions should have...
I don't doubt that you have made valuable progress here. However, as my time is limited, my modus operandi must be to only review PRs that pass tests, I'm afraid.
Any chance someone has time to push this one along? I think this would be great feature.
Yes it would be great to get help with this. I don't have any new thoughts on this, and actually haven't been thinking about this recently. Possibly @OkonSamuel, who worked...
| This can be implemented as a wrapper model similar to the way we implement EnsembleModel. I think the right approach is to view this as an `Unsupervised` transformer (wrapping...
@vboussange I have a Master's student keen to take this on now. What is the status of your own efforts? Are you happy for him to take this on? He...
These are either sorted or tracked [here](https://github.com/alan-turing-institute/MLJ.jl/blob/dev/test/integration.jl).
Closing as stale
It's been a while since I posted the above POC. Here's an updated version, based on more recent versions of the packages, and some other mild changes. You'll need MLJBase...