Anthony Blaom, PhD

@rikhuijzer

```julia julia> scitype([1.0, 2.3, missing, 3.5]) AbstractVector{Union{Missing, Continuous}} (alias for AbstractArray{Union{Missing, Continuous}, 1}) ```

> The problem is that `AbstractVector{Continuous}

I suppose with some work we could create a wrapper that essentially "mutafies" the original model (overload `setproperty!` to re-generate the atomic model each time it's called) but that would...

> I wonder if hyperparameter tuning could leverage [Setfield.jl](https://github.com/jw3126/Setfield.jl) [We already do](https://github.com/JuliaAI/MLJBase.jl/blob/4d1ed14e7b1034fbe00c4dde3550144180da5225/src/utilities.jl#L98) (in-house) recursive `setproperty!`. I'm not understanding how that helps us, though. Except to make implementation of the proposed...

> Also, I am starting to document the various MLJ models in detail using standard struct docstring, if I interpreted the warning message correctly. Yes, you are interpreting this correctly....

@sylvaticus Looks like I need to update the MLJ model registry first. Will get onto that today.

While doing this I noticed some traces of "MissingImputator" which I'm guessing is an obsolete model from BetaML ? ```julia using MLJModels # after updating registry julia> models() do m...

Okay. Looks like only the package metadata for that model been changed, which probably won't break much, if anything. And your release is tagged breaking anyway. ```julia julia> info("MissingImputator") (name...

This PR completes the model registry update: https://github.com/JuliaRegistries/General/pull/69552. Be great to get a PR for the MLJ doc change (list of models)!