Austin Bingham

In principle I agree, though I don't know if we'll be getting that feature any time soon. If it's simple to implement on the client end, it might be a...

That's an interesting idea, and I don't think it would be too much work in principle. I wonder a bit about how fine-grained it should be, though. For example, should...

I'm not really maintaining this any more, but I'm happy to merge in simple PRs (with the understanding that I won't actually review them in any depth).

I've also seen the problem where only a subset of the available completions are returned. It appears that we're displaying everything we get from ycmd, i.e. that ycmd is only...

@valloric Is there any reason (e.g. a configuration option) that `ycmd` would not be returning all possible completions? We've produced some (fairly pathological) examples where it appears that we're not...

Hmmm. I'm honestly not sure the right way to do this. A checker can specify *chained checkers* in its specification by using `:next-checkers`, but that means that `flycheck-vale` would need...

That's frustrating, but hopefully they'll sort this out soon on the flycheck end. I guess it wouldn't be too hard to define a second checker in `flycheck-vale.el` that *does* use...

@dgutov When you set `ycmd-max-num-identifier-candidates`, did you do so after ycmd had been started? I looked at bit at the `ycmd-max-num-identifier-candidates` issue, and there's some surprising behavior here. The max-identifiers...

@dgutov Are you saying the emacs-ycmd doesn't work at all, i.e. from a fresh emacs restart? If so, are you sure you've got the most recent emacs-ycmd and ycmd?

Since users set `ycmd-server-command`, it doesn't seem reasonable that we can inject "-u" into it reliably. Who knows what their launcher command is. It might be better if we set:...