Abbas Cyclewala
Abbas Cyclewala
@Makciek , it is recommended to use it as single instance to benefit from caching of compilation. Also, it is thread safe, so you can use same instance at same...
@vanwx localParam is like a local variable in code, they do not share reference with any other rule or execution. So it should be completely thread safe
@soarwing52 I was facing similar issue, what worked for me was setting buffered:true in body attribute `[Body(true)] myobject`
@ying234 complex scenarios can be enabled via actions such as evaluateRule and ExecuteActionWorkflowAsync . Please refer this example - https://microsoft.github.io/RulesEngine/#evaluaterule
@xuzeyu91 RulesEngine is currently exported as netstandard2.0 and net6.0 both of which is compatible with net8.0 But we are planning to add 8.0 targeted nuget as well
@douglasgalico , your requirement appears very similar to performance mode settings in `ReSettings`. https://github.com/microsoft/RulesEngine/blob/9bcf4f334b7b98b4ab2d347522ff86b3e884afed/src/RulesEngine/Models/ReSettings.cs#L80-L94 Can you check this and let me know if this is what you are looking for?
@douglasgalico interesting idea would like to understand more on where you would need to selectively use it vs whole workflow execution. I do understand one use case where for some...
@subashgh234 we will update to dotnet 8 while supporting dotnet standard 2.0. plan is to do it soon along with a few other changes.
@knjeckil can you share sample code to reproduce this issue?
@khPhoenix can you share `MyParam` class definition?