aawsome
aawsome
@ppoilbarbe While I agree on the use case, I would actually vote for adding this feature to the `check` command, i.e. something like `check --read-data-from-snapshot `.
Thanks @n8henrie for opening this issue! Can you give some use cases where you are using `find`? In fact, implementing it like it's done in restic would be very straightforward....
@n8henrie Are you still interested?
@n8henrie Great that you are about to start - and no worry, we all work in our free time so delays from time to time are pretty common... Do you...
Just some comments why I think the first one is a different use case: When we are searching for a given full path, we know that this can only be...
closing this as it has been implemented in #1136
@n8henrie Thanks a lot for your offer! An easy way to start with small contributions (besides opening issues which is also warmly welcome!) is to improve the docu: https://github.com/rustic-rs/docs
@florensie Thanks for opening the issue - in fact rustic doesn't return exit codes if something fails. This should be enhanced. A workaround is to grep the output for error...
Sorry for the late follow-up! Out of curiosity: Can you describe your use case in more detail? What do you want to do and where do you need the information...
I just recalled that non-0 exit codes should be already implemented; at least I thought that ```Rust if let Err(err) = self.inner_run() { status_err!("{}", err); RUSTIC_APP.shutdown(Shutdown::Crash); }; ``` should do...