aaronvg

Ok I took @jkonowitch repro, for this test and it works now: https://github.com/BoundaryML/baml/pull/1831 Should be out tomorrow, The change would be to add `module_format esm` to the generator

LMK if I'm missing something here, but it seems the only change needed was to change all relative imports in baml_client to use `.js` extension. and now folks must import...

Can you try 0.85.0 version of the extension and @boundaryml/baml package? ``` generator tyepscript { .... module_format "esm" } ```

ok so it seems we fixed the esm compatibility in `baml_client`, but we still need to fix it in `@boundaryml/baml` package. For my own visibility, this issue is likely related:...

this seems like the actual remaining fix here https://github.com/BoundaryML/baml/pull/2489/files but requires more testing

thanks for the bug report -- we'll release another batch of bugfixes for Go soon

related: https://github.com/emilsoman/baml_elixir

yep it is supported now! https://docs.boundaryml.com/ref/baml/types#pdf Version 0.202+

would it be better to instead add the @description to the FieldDescription, but keep comments as comments? Otherwise it seems strange to add both comments and @descriptions in there. Of...

yep exactly