Aaron Powell

Consider the old branch dead, it's quite diverged from `master` so I probably should just delete it 😝

@jonifen I can see the direction that you're going with that approach, but I disagree with it slightly. I'm not a fan of adding another database table if I don't...

Ah sorry, missed that part of the comment. Yes, removals are a bit... special. The export that you get from Umbraco of a doctype will only contain what the doctype...

Hmm... I thought it was adding the binding redirects. I'll have to check though

Ultimately, it doesn't really work with Umbraco 8. I started this as a PoC mainly but I don't actively do anything with Umbraco these days (and haven't for a long...

I'm not sure if this (and #96) would fit as part of the core of Chauffeur for v7 or it'd be better as a plugin (either part of [ExternalPackages](https://github.com/aaronpowell/chauffeur.externalpackages) or...

You can create your own NuGet package which contains the code (and has the dependency of `Chauffeur`) because Chauffeur just picks up everything in the `bin` folder to load, so...

@ohadschn yep I've had a read through it, the thing that's confusing me is the virtual directory stuff with Functions, I'm not sure if that's supported. I'm now trying to...

> is it somehow related to #2667 ? That PR only solves the dotnet-isolated scenario, not the dotnet in-proc one.

> @aaronpowell , any idea if there is any further work on this? Or @apawast? Looks like there's a bug in the template selection logic, I've raised #3171 for it.