functions vs. options in functions

[aaronpeikert]

Inspired by:

worcs::consistency_check():

• Run entry point
• Checksum exit point(s)

repro::use_travis_consistency_check()

• Do the above, but on Travis using testthat

Originally posted by @cjvanlissa in https://github.com/cjvanlissa/worcs/issues/72#issuecomment-635802191

Should it be repro::use_consitency_check(where = "local") vs repro::use_consitency_check(where = "travis")

That is general a question for me and I'd like to find some rule of thumb for that...

[cjvanlissa]

One key difference is that a local consistency check will usually be a one-off, whereas travis will be continuous integrated testing