Adrian Roselli

> All I'm saying is that this is not the best issue to discuss that broader question. Fair enough. I don't see an issue for discussing the accessibility impacts I...

> Looks like scott filed one here: https://github.com/whatwg/html/issues/10317 Indeed he did. And I very much appreciate that Scott did so. But I note it was not filed alongside this issue...

> There are great folks working on making AT able to understand more types of things, and represent more complex content in a way that works for AT users. FWIW,...

> Fair. I'm not a practitioner, and I likely am using "AT" incorrectly. Is there a better term for all of the affected tech here? No, that is the [correct...

If an author can identify what value needs to be set in `headinglevelstart`, then it stands to reason the author can increment that in their own code for each descendant...

@LJWatson, to your point about the Priority of Constituencies, I feel that pushing the logic to the UA creates a black box that will make it easier for developers to...

@jimmyfrasche, I feel bad that my response is so brief as to seem dismissive, but I understand your points and agree with many. After my last comment I am not...

Memorializing (per request) my suggestion on the WG call that this may be worth discussing in Accessible Name spec. Can we calculate field accName when in well-formed tables, with override...

For any form control that has no accName (from [2.A](https://w3c.github.io/accname/#comp_hidden_not_referenced) through [2.I](https://w3c.github.io/accname/#comp_tooltip) of the [Accessible Name and Description Computation 1.2](https://w3c.github.io/accname/)), I am going to propose a new step to calculate...

ping @spectranaut @jnurthen as I am new to the deep dive process.