Anton Bachin

(Note: I apologize for not replying earlier about the instructions – I assumed you had been referring to having to regenerate the macro using the Python script, in which case...

That all sounds good. Some of the tests are actually the tutorials and the advanced demos, and there are some Python scripts that convert them from Markdown to C++. When...

Also, FYI, @mitsutaka-takeda added a `CMakeLists.txt` file for the library itself in [this commit](https://github.com/mitsutaka-takeda/better-enums/commit/924c17aff49250751c930274679d6a929365fde8) in a fork, and has graciously given permission to cherry pick it (thanks!). I didn't give...

Thanks for your work so far! > Well since you are (currently) a header-only library, there is very little benefit to having a CMake script outside of building unit tests....

> So would it be fair to say that we leave the examples out of the unit tests? You stated you had planned to pull them out anyway. In their...

Thanks. Just to be clear, this root `CMakeLists.txt` isn't in Better Enums now, it's in a fork. Your explanation sounds like it would be good to cherry-pick it over here....

Ah, fair enough. I was talking about the linked one. I agree with all the goals, at least for unit testing. We may still need to keep Python around for...

> Sure, I'm not on a witch hunt or anything. No worries, I understood you :) It's likely that there won't be any Python steps at all for the docs,...

Yep, this is (was at the time) a well-known GCC bug in their `constexpr` support. I remember dealing with it back when GCC 4.6 was current :p In the `master`...

> If I understand correctly, the coverage (%) is based on instrumented _and_ visited files during tests' executions. Lets say I have: Almost correct — the issue is specifically that...