bisect_ppx
bisect_ppx copied to clipboard
aantron
Code coverage for OCaml and ReScript
@jchavarri pointed me at this working branch of @joprice https://github.com/aantron/bisect_ppx/compare/master...joprice:bisect_ppx:add-melange-support+flake @trite, @mlms13 and I are hoping to get melange compatible version of bisect_ppx out to opam. Is there anything else...
Cobertura supports partial coverage on conditions, with this format : ```xml ``` Here's cobertura DTD: ```dtd ``` Branch and coverage defaults to false and 100% meaning, unlike html report, we...
In response to a [post](https://discuss.ocaml.org/t/how-to-set-up-unit-testing-in-2023/12682/15?u=antron) on Discuss: > Yeah, this is true. Only complaint I have about the reports is the color scheme is terrible for people like me with...
`bisect_ppx` fails to build with rescript 10. I have an example repo here: https://github.com/adnelson/rescript-10-bisect * Clone the repo * `yarn` * `yarn rescript build` ``` { "name": "rescript-10-bisect", "version": "1.0.0",...
I was surprised that `--expect` switch requires a directory with slash to properly check that it is in report. Without a lash it complains. Maybe we can insert this trailing...
In https://github.com/aantron/bisect_ppx/issues/423#issuecomment-1640970471: > > Bisect tries to instrument after an application expression, but not when the application expression is in tail position, because that would ruin tail call optimization and...
If yes, could you please add some instructions to README?
It seems that there is a bug with bisect_ppx in our internal project, as some expect_tests are not being captured. However, when I change some of the expected test case,...
Hi, I am packaging bisect_ppx to Debian. But now I get one spelling warning as follows: ``` I: libbisect-ppx-ocaml-dev: spelling-error-in-binary Upto Up to [usr/lib/ocaml/bisect_ppx/ppx.exe] ``` But I can not `grep`...
