Andrea Aime

I see lots of activity... is the PR ready for review? It's still marked as "DRAFT". There is a "Ready for review" button at the bottom of the PR page,...

How are you doing with this one? 2.22-RC should have been released a month ago...

According to GSIP 77 this PR should have been delayed to 2.23.x (I've sent a reminder to the list, we have rules covering these cases, we just need to apply...

Looked good, but the change on the test picked my interest for a deeper look. Found this change comes with its own set of challenges: * The password field is...

Not all is lost, this PR is being recovered and completed here: https://github.com/geoserver/geoserver/pull/6338

It is waiting on votes: @tbarsballe, @smithkm and @jratike80 haven't voted on the proposal yet, and the 10 days wait has not expired either. Monday it will be ready for...

@jeanpommier you should probably rebase everything on the latest main branch, some of the failures are due to a mis-alignment between new functionality provided by GeoTools and expectations in (a...

PR is a mess, contains unrelated changes, does not refer to a GeoServer ticket. The original author is no longer working on GeoServer, someone needs to step up and clean...

Several compile failures, seems the upgrade is not complete... at least 3 modules still using it?

@groldan can this module just use the same jackson version as the rest of GeoServer? Doing so would also address this PR.