Zoom

> (It should also be noted that most noise suppression that users encounter in the wild is a simple check box with no further parameters, so I don't see this...

I say, soft deprecation is fine, but this can easily wait for some bigger structural changes, such as moving some procedures here from other modules. It's better to bundle potential...

Since now we have a `iterable[t]` that's a magic type, it would be nice to have some comparison between the two options and plans for defining the proper way of...

Shouldn't it read more like "anger" then? Just add a 'b' if you're concerned: "Nim goto-based intermediate representation": "_Angie-Beer_". Well, the fact I'm more inclined to discuss the name shows...

Well, if you've changed the name and do not insist on a specific implementation, what's the main difference now compared to #525?

Thanks a lot for the fixes, receiving a human read-through is invaluable!

It's nice that the attitude to the issue changed from the answer given in 2014 (#1747): > No. If you use a folder more often that the others then you...

> It sounds strange that your Windows instance created the folder, if you shared the config and database between OSes. In that case, it should have noticed the folder marker...

I'd like to pose a few question which this RFC doesn't yet answer to the full extent. ## What problem does it solve? (Benefit) The necessity to repeat object field...

Readability is not about "how much" but "how clear". The **After RFC** example is obviously *not* less readable (in this specific case, where the variable names were carefully chosen), but...