Yashodhan

Hey, no this should be closed now. Thanks hegerdes for opening and helping to debug :)

Sure, I'll take a look at this :+1:

@posutsai , sure. May I request you to mark this as draft and ping me when this is ready to review? Also instead of having multiple functions or dealing with...

Hey, so I should have asked this a long time back, but even I'm catching this right now - What you have implemented is still using the absolute cgroup path...

> According to my understanding, the point of the unit test is to check correctness of the config related to relative CPU resource allocation e.g. shares, quota, period etc. instead...

> Hi, sorry for late reply. No worries! I'll try to take a look at this today or so.

Hey, sorry it took me a while to get to this, got busy with other stuff. So in your recent changes, you are correctly taking it using the function however...

@posutsai , ping!

Hey @posutsai , let me know if you have any issues, or cannot work this anymore. It is ok if you are busy with something else, just let me know...

> I would like to know if the key point is to specify cgroups path as following. Yes, we should be specifying the cgroups path similar to that. > Thus,...