Xyncgas
Xyncgas
why not ```[1; x]``` ```[1; x; 5]``` since it's a new language proposal, we can throw away that ```var```, similar to how we can write lambda without type name on...
But C++ is a compiled ahead language, C# goes through the JIT which should do const folding on ```public const bool C = A is not 3 and < 1...
Maybe instead of making it possible by doing what OptionCE did, I can make asyncOption CE to use voption instead of converting voption to option
I am screaming for threads too
For example, if I do ```F# MySeq |> AsyncSeq.MapAsyncParallel (fun x -> some operation) |> AsyncSeq.tryFirst ``` Do I get the first element as soon as some element is mapped...
My first contribution
> @Xyncgas I left some initial comments - we'd need tests too. Any reason this doesn't go direct into the main library? I didn't want to put stuff into the...