Xuanwo
Waiting for https://github.com/PyO3/pyo3/issues/4038
Has been fixed.
> Can I try this? Would need your guidance. Thank you for your interest. However, I haven't conducted thorough research on this issue yet, so you may need to devise...
> Please avoid request a large range of reviewers which cause noise. I'm guessing reviewers are requested as code owner.
> Python binding part LGTM. But I think there may get some throttle here, so we can't run 4 pcloud test success as the same time I believe they are...
> The throttle may come from the pcloud, not ours. Need to dive into the action failure Could you share the clues that led you to believe it's related to...
Take test async_copy as an example: ```shell 2024-01-25T04:16:32.466966Z DEBUG opendal::services: service=pcloud operation=copy from=2ef78cef-304b-44d2-901e-b73547de22a1 to=f74a7d1d-5e3c-470d-b483-9e3283d5dd89/7cd74ba0-296c-41b1-9836-b67a1d35921f/0c4541e6-0d0d-4309-ad28-4b47566e2062 -> finished at core/src/layers/logging.rs:385 2024-01-25T04:16:32.467052Z DEBUG opendal::services: service=pcloud operation=stat path=f74a7d1d-5e3c-470d-b483-9e3283d5dd89/7cd74ba0-296c-41b1-9836-b67a1d35921f/0c4541e6-0d0d-4309-ad28-4b47566e2062 -> started at core/src/layers/logging.rs:454 2024-01-25T04:16:32.669307Z DEBUG...
And is it a good idea for us to use `file_read` and `file_pread` instead? ref: https://docs.pcloud.com/methods/fileops/index.html
pcloud said those in docs: https://docs.pcloud.com/protocols/http_json_protocol/single_connection.html > The API server will not be able to respond correctly to two interleaved requests and data corruption may occur. While writes of small...
> So, should we change `Arc` to `Arc`? I'm not sure about that. Maybe we can drop copy and rename support of pcloud first?