Passing as a separate module of mgmtpf & xocl to avoid execution confl…

[raghkris]

…ict in a custom kernel

Problem solved by the commit

As the 2 drivers xocl/ & xclmgmt/ are being compiled as part of kernel image with static compilation, there was an issue of conflict with two driver registrations. Resolution is to add the string as new parameter in mgmt driver initialization. As part of custom kernel changes, xocl_debug_init() function is being called by both xclmgmt_init() and xocl_init() fucntions, so we differentiated with by passing parameters as module like "mgmtpf" & "xocl", to avoid execution conflict of xocl_debug_init() fucntions. Used separate module string name for both MGMTPF & XOCL to avoid macro and execution at runtime.

Bug / issue (if any) fixed, which PR introduced the bug, how it was discovered

How problem was solved, alternative solutions (if any) and why they were rejected

Risks (if any) associated the changes in the commit

What has been tested and how, request additional testing if necessary

Documentation impact (if any)

[gbuildx]

raghkris - is not a collaborator Can XRT admins please validate PR

[gbuildx]

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

[gbuildx]

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

[gbuildx]

raghkris - is not a collaborator Can XRT admins please validate PR

[gbuildx]

raghkris - is not a collaborator Can XRT admins please validate PR

[chvamshi-xilinx]

Closing as these are available in 2022.2