Don't rename event accessors

[privateunit]

@XenocodeRCE Hello! I'd like to provide you information about the particular issue that I found in the renaming behaviour.

It's currently renaming event accessor methods (add & remove) that's should be untouched to prevent arising "missing implementation" exceptions.

Add additional checks in the AnalyzeMember(MethodDef method) method of RenameAnalyzer type like this one:

if (method.IsSpecialName && (method.IsAddOn || method.IsRemoveOn)) return false;

[XenocodeRCE]

@privateunit have you got any informations about why they shouldn't be renamed ?

Also at this point you can easily make a pull request

[Rottweiler]

+1 method.IsStaticConstructor also important