XAMPPRocky

Ah I see what you mean. I'm a bit torn on which is preferable as `key` is more general terminology that more people will know and is less characters to...

> I was operating under the assumption that since we (as of yet) have not been assigned an official status as a language WG, starting our own discrete server would...

> If cargo-install is an important use case for dev tools, how much should we look at improving it? I think this is part of a lot broader area of...

@kbknapp I think what you've listed as reasons cargo shouldn't be used as a build, is exactly the reasons this working group should push for solving those problems as anything...

@spacekookie I feel like that is bit too much of generalisation on end users and the applications being made. Obviously if you're making a tool that helps write python applications...

A good solution I've found is if your program is going to call `print!`/`println!` a lot of times, replacing those calls with `write!` and writing into a `std::io::BufWriter` bound to...

I think with the deprecation of `extern crate` and only requiring dependencies to be defined in the `Cargo.toml` would alleviate a lot of the issues of starting from scratch and...

For some of items mentioned at the top could a utility be built that lints against binaries in general? For example you give it a list of commands, ones that...

While curses/TUI's aren't covered by the WG I would like to see some way of having responsive cli output for humans as currently to be the most compatible you have...

@killercup I believe normalisation on happens on HFS+ on macOS, I don't believe APFS does normalisation on the mac.