yolov9
yolov9 copied to clipboard
why is YOLO-e performing worse than YOLO-c on my custom dataset?
I run YOLOv9-c and YOLOv9-e. YOLOv9-c results for prec, rec, and map values are 98.9, 98, 99.2 and 48.7 respectively while for YOLOv9-e results were 95.8, 95, 94.4, 45.7.
wasn't E supposed to give better results than C? Thats what I assumed or what am i missing here ? @WongKinYiu Please help me understand if I'm missing out anything?
It depends on your dataset, the task to be accomplished, the number of images you have, and their diversity.
When you have little information in a piece of data, a large model will abstract it too much, and therefore have bad results, for example.
Thanks for reply. My dataset is a sequence of CCTV footage (short clips) with a man carrying an object. There is no variety in it. I just extracted frames (images) from those clips and used these images for training. Just 500 images. That could be the reason.
If I have a dataset contains about 2,000 images, could I see it as a large dataset?
If I have a dataset contains about 2,000 images, could I see it as a large dataset?
I think no But it depends How many classes / instances per classes do you have ?
If I have a dataset contains about 2,000 images, could I see it as a large dataset?
I think no But it depends How many classes / instances per classes do you have ?
I have 10 classes and about 40,000 instances totally. I think it is large, so I plan to use yolov9-e-dseg.yaml to solve it. Maybe I should try both and compare them.
If I have a dataset contains about 2,000 images, could I see it as a large dataset?
I think no But it depends How many classes / instances per classes do you have ?
I have 10 classes and about 40,000 instances totally. I think it is large, so I plan to use yolov9-e-dseg.yaml to solve it. Maybe I should try both and compare them.
Yes, do some experiment plan
Check this for more informations (yolov5 docs, but it's pretty the samedi things) : https://docs.ultralytics.com/yolov5/tutorials/tips_for_best_training_results/