Ryan
@Commodore64x That is what this issue is about. This is about allowing TFM to handle permissions for other plugins in addition to its own in-house permissions system.
@Commodore64x What you are suggesting undermines the entire system we have for TotalFreedom, and breaks the fact we are actually all-op. Otherwise we can no longer claim to be all-op....
@ChargedCreeper I have no issue what so ever with having TFM handle other plugins permissions, thats part of its purpose. I do have an issue with making TFM dependent on...
@Commodore64x We may have to customise plugins. The intent here is to provide an actual OP experience. Otherwise we may as well trash TFM and move to Pex / GM...
@Commodore64x I cant see that being practical without removing the ability to actually op someone...
So you want to migrate the Essentials /msg commands to TFM?
Yeah, I am not opposed to the idea. In an ideal world TFM would remove the need for many if any other plugins. I see no reason why this sort...
I was sure we'd already had an issue for this, apparently not. The current Core Protect implementation method is not great, at all. I wont get into the discussion about...
So looking at this on a practical level. CoreProtect does not open source their code, or host any sort of Maven repo that we can use. As a result we...
@OxLemonxO I dont think that would work with the CI systems? As you're just building it basically as an after thought?