Michal Koutný
Michal Koutný
I'm closing this proposal in favor of #24961.
IIUC, the scrub IO is carried out from the actual btrfs-prog process? (I.e. no deferral to kthreads.) When a scrub thread waits for IO, can it possibly (exclusively) hold any...
> user space cannot interfere with that. No argument about that. But the holder could be waiting (longer) for a throttled IO. Or are locks released before issuing the IO?...
The reported transient unit is a .slice but the checking show command won't specify unit type, i.e. defaults to .service and there's no such service, so show command shows default...
@sounix000 Thanks for the feedback. I've commented to respective threads and I didn't touch the branch now. It requires rebase meanwhile, so I'll leave it up to you, I'm OK...
There are lots of whitespace changes and rewrapping. I can't check it much :-/ (I'm not opposing this commit but it's feedback for the next time I need to review...
> I format the XML of the entire file Don't cease with that, simply make separate commits: 1) automatic reformat, 2) content changes. I will know to look at the...
@yuwata thanks for the review. 1st force push -- rebase on main 2nd force push -- your review fixups 3nd push -- another correction to handle not only high number...
> What kind of a system are we even talking about here? What kind of a system has 3000 mounts in the root mount namespace? It's a system with hundreds...