meetings icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
meetings copied to clipboard
verified publisher icon WebAssembly

October 2022 Hybrid meeting agenda

Open dtig opened this issue 3 years ago • 5 comments

What should we discuss at the next in-person (with virtual attendance options) meeting? Please use this issue to add items you would like to discuss, and are interested in hearing about.

dtig avatar Sep 12 '22 23:09 dtig

  1. Would like to have a fiber switching session + vote
  2. Would like to get a vote on JSPI

fgmccabe avatar Sep 12 '22 23:09 fgmccabe

Aiming to have a Threads to phase 3 vote (currently hacking away at the outstanding test suite requirements).

conrad-watt avatar Sep 12 '22 23:09 conrad-watt

It would be good to do an update on GC progress since we entered phase 2. It's possible but unlikely that we'll be ready for a phase 3 vote. We'll know for sure closer to the meeting.

tlively avatar Sep 12 '22 23:09 tlively

I can give an update on Relaxed SIMD, and potentially a poll for Phase 4.

ngzhian avatar Sep 12 '22 23:09 ngzhian

Hi all, I've begun a list of items to be scheduled across the two days https://github.com/WebAssembly/meetings/blob/main/main/2022/CG-10.md#items-to-be-assigned-slots

Anyone who's already proposed an item should suggest a tentative timebox and note any scheduling constraints. Anyone who would still like to propose an item can comment here or open a PR against the agenda linked above.

conrad-watt avatar Sep 20 '22 20:09 conrad-watt

Can we add a logistical note to the page to put the Google office address (for those scheduling hotels)?

Thanks.

titzer avatar Sep 27 '22 18:09 titzer

Also, I think we should have a slot devoted to talking about roadmap and strategy overall for Wasm. The format for the slot might be a panel or open discussion. Overall I'd like us to reestablish a shared sense of direction for the overall picture at a higher level than individual proposals.

titzer avatar Sep 28 '22 17:09 titzer

@titzer, that sounds like a good idea. Do you have a structure, or some high level discussion points and a guess at a time allotment?

dtig avatar Oct 04 '22 22:10 dtig

I think we should take at least 30 minutes and do it sort of like a round table.

A few key questions for discussion, off the top of my head:

  1. Who do we see as the key stakeholders (not in the room) that can benefit from Wasm?
  2. What are priorities for 2023 and beyond with Wasm?
  3. How should we balance depth (e.g. better penetration into the Web platform) versus breadth (new platforms) of influence?
  4. What are the good and bad parts of our process--what is working and what can be improved?

titzer avatar Oct 05 '22 18:10 titzer