Warcraft-Guardians-of-Azeroth
Warcraft-Guardians-of-Azeroth copied to clipboard
Warcraft-GoA-Development-Team
[SUGGESTION] | Replace T5 naming of generic artifacts with unique/named artifacts like in vanilla
Remove T5 from the generic naming of the type "(prefix) insert_weapon_type of (suffix)" with unique artifact names from wow, like "truesilver champion" etc.
why so? couldn't t5 just be excluded from the general rule and get ~10 names to pick from for each type of artifact?
why so?
because this
get ~10 names to pick from for each type of artifact
is 10 times less names (10 prefix x 10 suffix = 100 names) than the current system has?
is 10 times less names (10 prefix x 10 suffix = 100 names) than the current system has?
only for T5, seems not like that big a problem. would still be 3.3 times more then in vanilla. Plus, we'd get some more references to WoW. Came up yesterday when speaking about adding more artifacts that were suggested earlier.
only for T5, seems not like that big a problem
I'm strongly against it, anyway. There is no reason to make good things worse.
Plus, we'd get some more references to WoW.
I'm sure you can come up with better idea how to get "more references to WoW", without deleting the entire T5 naming system and making it 10 times less variative.
I'm sure you can come up with better idea how to get "more references to WoW", without deleting the entire T5 naming system and making it 10 times less variative.
Well, since the idea was about putting artifacts in the game that are not lore-artifacts, not really.
not really
For example, instead of deleting the entire naming system for T5, we can spawn some amount of generic legendary artifacts on game start, that will have WoW referencing name and description, instead of generic ones.
we can spawn some amount of generic legendary artifacts on game start
which would be the same as spawning random T5 artifacts...
which would be the same as spawning random T5 artifacts...
Spawning a rare Easter egg and generic T5 item is quite different