focus-visible icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
focus-visible copied to clipboard

Don't enable polyfill if browser supports ":focus-visible"

Open kutensky opened this issue 5 years ago • 5 comments

Currently Chrome with experimental flag enabled supports ":focus-visible" polyfill. It would be nice if polyfill could be enabled only if current browser doesn' support ":focus-visible". To do that, I propose to check pseudo-class support using this method:

supportsPseudo = function (pseudoClass) {
	// Get the document stylesheet
	var ss = document.styleSheets[0];

	// Create a stylesheet if one doesn't exist
	if (!ss) {
		var el = document.createElement('style');
		document.head.appendChild(el);
		ss = document.styleSheets[0];
		document.head.removeChild(el);
	}

	// Test the pseudo-class by trying to style with it
	var testPseudo = function () {
		try {
			if (!(/^:/).test(pseudoClass)) {
				pseudoClass = ':' + pseudoClass;
			}
			ss.insertRule('html' + pseudoClass + '{}', 0);
			ss.deleteRule(0);
			return true;
		} catch(e) {
			return false;
		}
	};

	// Run the test
	return testPseudo();
};

And then in polyfill modify code on the line 306 with:

if (typeof document !== 'undefined' && !supportsPseudo("focus-visible")) {
	// Apply the polyfill to the global document, so that no JavaScript
	// coordination is required to use the polyfill in the top-level document:
	applyFocusVisiblePolyfill(document);
}

After that we will be able to write css rules for both native ":focus-visible" and polyfill version:

:focus:not(:focus-visible) {
	outline: 0;
}
.js-focus-visible :focus:not(.focus-visible) {
	outline: 0;
}

kutensky avatar Aug 28 '20 13:08 kutensky

Drive by, but that's a really really expensive way to test for a pseudo-element. try { document.querySelector(":focus-visible"); return true; } catch { return false } should be much faster.

emilio avatar Aug 29 '20 15:08 emilio

I’m afraid this requires double your style declarations for .focus-visible to make it work with or without the “polyfill” (technically this project isn’t a real polyfill).

Justineo avatar Aug 30 '20 00:08 Justineo

I’m afraid this requires double your style declarations for .focus-visible to make it work with or without the “polyfill” (technically this project isn’t a real polyfill).

Yeap, that will require a double style declaration. But on the other hand, when browsers start to support his feature (Chrome is going to start supporting it from v.86), no js run will be needed. Currently, polyfill does a lot of background work that isn't good for performance.

kutensky avatar Aug 30 '20 21:08 kutensky

Very good points from everyone.

It sounds like if we land this then we should use @emilio's implementation, but also land a note in the README which explains the need to double up your style declarations. We could also add a note that if folks would prefer, they can use the postcss plugin (https://github.com/csstools/postcss-focus-visible) which I think will let them write their CSS using :focus-visible and then it'll do the right thing depending on their browser support matrix. I'm not a post-css expert but I think that's how it works :)

robdodson avatar Oct 09 '20 16:10 robdodson

Related to #244

This condition could help

if (!window.CSS?.supports?.("selector(:focus-visible)")) { 
  // Apply the polyfill
}

ryuran avatar Nov 15 '22 09:11 ryuran