first-party-sets
first-party-sets copied to clipboard
service and associated Subset Interaction
Consider the domains from the spec as an example:
- Set primary:
exampleA.com
- Service:
exampleA-usercontent.com
- Associated:
exampleB.com
From the spec it is clear that as a top-level context exampleA.com
would be able to use the cookies of exampleA-usercontent.com
without a prompt, but would (may?) show a user prompt to use the cookies of exampleB.com
.
What about exampleB.com
as a top-level context? Does it auto-grant when requesting to use the cookies of exampleA-usercontent.com
? If not, I’m concerned that exampleA.com
and exampleB.com
can cookie sync via exampleA-usercontent.com
.
The answer is yes, if in this scenario associated domains are required to show prompts or use other protective heuristics, then that needs to apply to access on the entire set, including service domains. I think we were aware of that consideration but may not have spelled it out properly in the explainer. Let's leave this issue open to track making this more explicit, maybe in the future spec.