Link to registry inclusion criteria definitions
Before this PR, the definitions were created but never linked it, which causes ReSpec warnings,
I don't think this is necessary as term definitions don't typically link to where they're used. It should be the opposite (the table headings link down to the definitions).
I don't think this is necessary as term definitions don't typically link to where they're used. It should be the opposite (the table headings link down to the definitions).
@timcappalli Yes, this was my understanding as well, but I got confused by the current state. So should I do the opposite or remove the definition tags altogether? As of today, they are throwing ReSpec warnings and I believe we should get this fixed before publishing the FWPD.
WDYT?
@mohamedamir reversed them in https://github.com/w3c-fedid/digital-credentials/pull/236/commits/92da6972ec74a3f9174cd328150fe3f4443e930d
Thanks @timcappalli This indeed makes more sense!