Retracted article listed in https://scholia.toolforge.org/retraction/ but in https://scholia.toolforge.org/retraction/Q29617959 does not indicate retraction

[fnielsen]

Describe the bug Retracted article listed in https://scholia.toolforge.org/retraction/ but in https://scholia.toolforge.org/retraction/Q29617959 does not indicate retraction

To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:

1. Go to https://scholia.toolforge.org/retraction/#most-cited-retracted-works
2. "Pluripotency of mesenchymal stem cells derived from adult marrow" listed
3. Got to https://scholia.toolforge.org/retraction/Q29617959
4. No warning of retraction, only "⚠️ Cites retracted article"

Screenshots

[egonw]

@fnielsen, ah, I left that out since this is on the /retraction/ aspect, and not the /work/ aspect. And since we are looking at it on the /retraction/ aspect, I considered it redundant information. However, the "cites retracted artic;e" is not redundant and I realized that adding that would make it more clear if the retraction is actually in a series of more problems.

How do you like to proceed. By my design, it is a feature not a bug.

[brierjonOU]

Design and information wise, it would make sense to indicate the retraction status. It would keep consistent information across the work scope and retraction scope when given a work item to ensure the user knows the item is retracted and not missing a statement. The retraction scope does not enforce viewing just retracted items and could view items that do not have the correct statements applied to indicate said status for a particular Q.

A case in point, a recently imported item which has a correction (not full retraction), but in many ways has a similar need to view items relying on that version to denote the correct DOI in a citation. This might be viewed in the retraction scope for those stumbling across the scope but it would not be clear if the item was actually retracted or left off because of the lacking a statement or being out of scope of /retraction/.

It might also be useful to denote "retracted on date" or "assumed not retracted & (last checked timestamp)" for any other items viewed not ins the retracted list.

For me the value of the retraction scope would be to view items relying on a work that changed status since publication, not just retractions. Those with corrections too for viewing the dependency graph and possible network of works relying on that work.

[brierjonOU]

Sorry, bad example. The example is just partial corrections and not full replacement publications. The concept though of a not yet flagged retraction or new publication would make sense to denote the status of the viewed work.