VitWW
Results
33
comments of
VitWW
Maybe it is better to use positive logic. not negative and have `#[may_unused]` instead of `#[must_use = false]`. Or ... `#[allow(dead_code)]` Your RFC number is lucky :)
Even if you call it "Implied types", in reality you are asking for "inferred Path" or "inferred partial path".
It will be ok for full "block" expressions: * unsafe * loop * ~while and while let~ * ~for~ * async * ~match~ * ~if and if let, if and...