Finish
This pull request introduces comprehensive documentation and onboarding guides for the VetsWhoCode LMS, improving developer experience and deployment reliability. It adds detailed setup instructions for GitHub OAuth, Vercel deployment, and a full LMS feature guide. It also updates the README with a new LMS section and fixes a test import path.
Documentation and Onboarding:
- Added
LMS_GUIDE.md, a complete guide covering LMS features, user roles, navigation, API endpoints, workflows, troubleshooting, and database schema. This makes onboarding and usage much easier for new contributors and users. - Added
GITHUB_OAUTH_SETUP.md, a step-by-step guide for configuring GitHub OAuth authentication for both production and development environments, including troubleshooting and security best practices. - Added
VERCEL_DEPLOYMENT.md, a deployment guide for Vercel, covering environment variables, database setup, admin role assignment, and common issues. - Updated
README.mdto include a new LMS section with quick setup, sign-in instructions, and links to the full guide, improving visibility and accessibility of LMS features.
Testing and Maintenance:
- Fixed import path in
__tests__/pages/media.tests.tsxto correctly reference theMediaPagecomponent, ensuring tests run reliably.
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
| Project | Deployment | Preview | Comments | Updated (UTC) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vets-who-code-app | Dec 5, 2025 4:52am |
๐ Code Quality Score Breakdown:
- ๐ Readability: 2/10
- ๐ Scalability: 5/10
- ๐ Performance: 5/10
- ๐ ๏ธ Maintainability: 8/10
- โ Overall Score: 5.0/10
๐ก Recommendations:
- ๐งน Reduce ESLint warnings to improve readability.
- ๐ฆ Break up complex functions or components.
- โ๏ธ Consider splitting large files or lazy-loading.
- ๐ Refactor to increase your overall score next cycle.
@jeromehardaway I've opened a new pull request, #837, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you.
@jeromehardaway I've opened a new pull request, #838, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you.
@jeromehardaway I've opened a new pull request, #839, to work on those changes. Once the pull request is ready, I'll request review from you.
๐ Code Quality Score Breakdown:
- ๐ Readability: 2/10
- ๐ Scalability: 5/10
- ๐ Performance: 5/10
- ๐ ๏ธ Maintainability: 8/10
- โ Overall Score: 5.0/10
๐ก Recommendations:
- ๐งน Reduce ESLint warnings to improve readability.
- ๐ฆ Break up complex functions or components.
- โ๏ธ Consider splitting large files or lazy-loading.
- ๐ Refactor to increase your overall score next cycle.
๐ Code Quality Score Breakdown:
- ๐ Readability: 2/10
- ๐ Scalability: 5/10
- ๐ Performance: 5/10
- ๐ ๏ธ Maintainability: 8/10
- โ Overall Score: 5.0/10
๐ก Recommendations:
- ๐งน Reduce ESLint warnings to improve readability.
- ๐ฆ Break up complex functions or components.
- โ๏ธ Consider splitting large files or lazy-loading.
- ๐ Refactor to increase your overall score next cycle.
๐ Code Quality Score Breakdown:
- ๐ Readability: 2/10
- ๐ Scalability: 5/10
- ๐ Performance: 5/10
- ๐ ๏ธ Maintainability: 8/10
- โ Overall Score: 5.0/10
๐ก Recommendations:
- ๐งน Reduce ESLint warnings to improve readability.
- ๐ฆ Break up complex functions or components.
- โ๏ธ Consider splitting large files or lazy-loading.
- ๐ Refactor to increase your overall score next cycle.
๐ Code Quality Score Breakdown:
- ๐ Readability: 2/10
- ๐ Scalability: 5/10
- ๐ Performance: 5/10
- ๐ ๏ธ Maintainability: 8/10
- โ Overall Score: 5.0/10
๐ก Recommendations:
- ๐งน Reduce ESLint warnings to improve readability.
- ๐ฆ Break up complex functions or components.
- โ๏ธ Consider splitting large files or lazy-loading.
- ๐ Refactor to increase your overall score next cycle.
๐ Code Quality Score Breakdown:
- ๐ Readability: 2/10
- ๐ Scalability: 5/10
- ๐ Performance: 5/10
- ๐ ๏ธ Maintainability: 8/10
- โ Overall Score: 5.0/10
๐ก Recommendations:
- ๐งน Reduce ESLint warnings to improve readability.
- ๐ฆ Break up complex functions or components.
- โ๏ธ Consider splitting large files or lazy-loading.
- ๐ Refactor to increase your overall score next cycle.
๐ Code Quality Score Breakdown:
- ๐ Readability: 2/10
- ๐ Scalability: 5/10
- ๐ Performance: 5/10
- ๐ ๏ธ Maintainability: 8/10
- โ Overall Score: 5.0/10
๐ก Recommendations:
- ๐งน Reduce ESLint warnings to improve readability.
- ๐ฆ Break up complex functions or components.
- โ๏ธ Consider splitting large files or lazy-loading.
- ๐ Refactor to increase your overall score next cycle.