implementation
implementation copied to clipboard
In this repo we will document how each method in the library should behave
[KotlinVerbalExpressions](https://github.com/VerbalExpressions/KotlinVerbalExpressions) only targets Kotlin/JVM, which is not a big surprise since the repo hasn't been updated since [Kotlin/JS](https://kotlinlang.org/docs/js-overview.html), [Kotlin/Native](https://kotlinlang.org/docs/native-overview.html), and [Kotlin/WASM](https://kotlinlang.org/docs/wasm-overview.html) have had more prominent releases. VerbalExpressions would be especially...
Hi, Is there any matrix/overview with the implementations of VerbalExpressions for various methods? It looks that there are allot of inconsistencies among language implementations :( . Thank you.
Would I be alone in thinking that having a unified, language-agnostic test suite would be beneficial? I've recently been thinking over the issue of unit tests for the different implementations...
Should the same series of inputs spit out exactly the same regex, or should the regex be platform-specific ? I'm referring mostly to the differences between the PHP & JS...
As I did on JS implementation, I recreate the issue there to discuss about "multiple" function. Some implementation return the given value with "+", other give "{2,}" To my side,...
As implemented in Python repo's pull request by @andrii1812 https://github.com/VerbalExpressions/PythonVerbalExpressions/pull/16
VerbalExpressions should have support for all the available [character classes](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regular_expression#Character_classes). Should we implement those as constants or just add them like in @andrii1812 's PR to Python repo: https://github.com/VerbalExpressions/PythonVerbalExpressions/pull/16 ```...
In CSharp we have made some common regex expressions, like e-mail and url. So e.g. one can write VerbEx something like: verbEx.StartOfLine().Then(CommonRegex.Email); I think this should be implemented similar across...
Still working on implementatin, I see the whole implementation (excepting mine, but I'm wrong to implement this before speaking about with you) uses this kind of method: ``` or(value) =>...
Testing again implementation, I've got some ideas... We have "Find(value)" method that returns: ``` (?:value) ``` Right... but there is no method to return: ``` (?!value) ``` We've got AnythingBut...