Nick Hodgskin
Nick Hodgskin
Related to issue #28
Just curious, the cards are low contrast with the background to give a sublte card vibe. Is that considered bad practice? (and whats the fix?) Or are these contrasts mainly...
I think the styling at the moment is good. If someone has an idea for a revamped site, please comment below (including a Figma design) and we can re-open. @dmlb...
`@razpt` from the Discord server has suggested a Figma redesign in [this Discord thread](https://discord.com/channels/897926845088014377/1055396192122572831/1260701665154306235). Follow there for more information. Re-opening to explore this avenue
Realised I still have some todo comments here...
Superceded by #2060
Overall, I think that looks good (namely the attributes available, and considerations on units and time extrapolation - didn't look into the unstructured naming conventions) . I can imagine this...
[Docs on `numpy.testing.assert_allclose`](https://numpy.org/doc/2.2/reference/generated/numpy.testing.assert_allclose.html) > The test is equivalent to `allclose(actual, desired, rtol, atol)` (**note that `allclose` has different default values**). This might cause failures in the test suite. Let's wait...
This didn't end up resulting in green ticks (likely due to tolerance issues) - updating it isn't worth it.
Just noticed your comment in #1844 @erikvansebille > - SGrids and time-varying depth dimensions (since they can be handled with the CROCO-type-advection kernel?) Perhaps you could elaborate here on this...