Dev Ojha
Dev Ojha
I don't really think the merge conflicts are that annoying of a problem. I do agree that changelog entries going into the wrong section is a big problem. With that...
> We should never have PRs without associated issue numbers. It's basically a requirement that you open an issue describing the change you want to make before opening a PR....
Good catch for negative numbers!
I support that @JeremyParish69 , thats a great idea
Understanding confirmation: Yes, sending side is totally ordered (as it is today, even for unordered channels!), but this is merely because IBC today increments sequence numbers to achieve a nonce....
Great point! We _should_ always be in the case that: * The data is actually available in some archive node and it just has to be obtained, in which case...
Oof I didn't see this until today. Just merged another PR doing the fix, my bad, should've done this PR first Thanks for the fix, and sorry for the pain...
@mattverse should we close this PR, and re-PR with elements you want added in still?
Closing per last comment
I believe this was fixed?