Bill Tozier

May (?) want to extend `:scalar-pow` to produce complex results from negative scalar arguments. But then again, what do we do with multiple roots? Would it produce the `:set` of...

- `:x->gene` (`genetic` aspect) - `:code->genes`

1688a8efb468c811a53bfe8527bd5cfce4592007

intermediate result (not available direct from code yet: ``` text :boolean-2bittable {:scalar 1, :booleans 0} -> {:booleans 1} :boolean-3bittable {:scalar 1, :booleans 0} -> {:booleans 1} :boolean->code {:boolean 1, :code...

Where should this fall in the `:recognizer` hierarchy? Should a `:rational` between 0 and 1 be a `:probability`? Should it fall _after_ `:scalar`, and only permit things to be pushed...

Basically this should be a specific `record`, and constructed explicitly as a literal or the result of a special probability calculation. Otherwise, it inevitably subverts the `:recognizer` chain.

One way to do this as a continuation: Suppose there is an `exec-each-pair` instruction, which takes a _single_ item and a collection, and produces `'(item (first list) :exec-each-pair item (rest...

I've been trying something along these lines https://gist.github.com/Vaguery/02562e901b8e0ec78c744ba28d14b8f3