VRamakrishna

@muralisrini : I meant "crash" from my perspective, as the chaincode exits unexpectedly without warning. I discussed this bug with Manish before I filed, and he said you'd be able...

@muralisrini : Do you mean I need to send an "init" request before sending other requests? I was not aware that was mandatory; is it documented anywhere? Is it not...

@muralisrini : I don't see any way to enforce that in the application logic, as multiple "users" in different roles could load a web page on their respective browsers and...

I believe it's still an issue (see my last comment on the thread.) Since a calling application has no way of knowing what state a chaincode's state machine is in,...

Hi All, Is there a timeline to fix this bug? In the India Research Lab, we are developing a PoC application for client that depends on applications receiving timely notifications...

@outsidethecode Left several suggestions for you in response to comments made by @outSH . Please fix these, and then, assuming the tests pass, we should be ready to merge.

@RafaelAPB There's one outstanding comment from Michal that I didn't notice earlier, but have just asked Zakwan to fix. @petermetz I think all your queries have been resolved. There's one...

FYI, this PR needs to be approved BEFORE #3001 .

@RafaelAPB How do you define "consortium" here? Fabric has a particular notion of a consortium, but I wonder what you mean by it in the Cacti (or interoperability) context.

> @VRamakrishna, This would be a good topic to present at the [Indy Contributors Meeting](https://wiki.hyperledger.org/display/indy/Indy+Contributors+Meeting). Next meeting will be February 27th at 8:00am Pacific. > > cc @cjhowland, @Toktar, @swcurran,...