Fix `%EDITSUMMARY%`

[Universal-Omega]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• New Features

  • Improved retrieval of article revision comments for more accurate and consistent data.

• Bug Fixes

  • Enhanced query building process for better performance and reliability.

• Tests

  • Added a new test to verify the retrieval of edit summaries for specific revisions.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #153 (907cbea) into master (693336b) will increase coverage by 0.01%. The diff coverage is 9.09%.

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #153      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage     10.71%   10.72%   +0.01%     
  Complexity     1569     1569              
============================================
  Files            23       23              
  Lines          4257     4261       +4     
============================================
+ Hits            456      457       +1     
- Misses         3801     3804       +3     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
includes/Article.php	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
includes/Query.php	39.56% <11.11%> (+0.01%)	:arrow_up:

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

[coderabbitai[bot]]

Walkthrough

The recent changes primarily focus on enhancing how comments for article revisions are retrieved in the MediaWiki platform. Instead of directly assigning comments from a database row, the system now utilizes MediaWikiServices to fetch comments from the comment store. Additionally, adjustments were made to SQL query handling and integration tests were updated to ensure proper retrieval of edit summaries.

Changes

File Path	Change Summary
includes/Article.php	Modified newFromRow method to fetch comments using MediaWikiServices.
includes/Query.php	Updated buildAndSelect method to assign $this->sqlQuery and adjusted _firstrevisionsince method.
tests/phpunit/DPLQueryIntegrationTest.php	Added testGetEditSummary() method to test retrieval of edit summaries for revisions.

🐇 In the code where comments flow, A service now will make it so, With queries tuned and tests in line, Our revisions shine, divine.

~ CodeRabbit 🐇

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
  • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[Universal-Omega]

@coderabbitai review

[coderabbitai[bot]]

Actions Performed

Review triggered.

Note: CodeRabbit is an incremental review system and does not re-review already reviewed commits. This command is applicable only when automatic reviews are paused.