xpose
xpose copied to clipboard
depreciate xpose_data?
We currently have xpose_data()
for nonmem and xpose_data_nlmixr()
for nlmixr. For consistency I am thinking of soft depreciating xpose_data()
and rename it xpdb_nm()
or xpose_nm()
(or other if suggestions) we would then get similar naming for nlmixr e.g. xpdb_nlmixr()
or xpose_nlmixr()
. Any thoughts @andrewhooker @sebastianueckert, @MikeKSmith , @mattfidler?