EPATADA 642 update package to use instead of

Setting up draft PR to compare tests

Oct 14 '25 19:10 jbousquin

coverage-report

File	Coverage		Missing
All files	`33%`	:white_check_mark:
R/ATTAINSCrosswalks.R	`22%`	:white_check_mark:	`64-742` `931-941` `945-949` `954-957` `962` `970-973` `980-983` `988-1009` `1017-1027` `1052-1055` `1179-1254` `1266` `1273-1451` `1621-1633` `1637-1640` `1645-1647` `1675-1678` `1689-1692` `1700-1704` `1716-1720` `1732-1738` `1743-1754` `1760` `1768-1771` `1861-1867` `1872-1874` `1979` `1986-2157` `2338-2724` `2850-2853` `2868` `2876-2879` `2886-2904` `2912-2916` `2927-2931` `2947-3009` `3056-3146` `3151-3154` `3159-3253`
R/ATTAINSRefTables.R	`0%`	:x:	`17-226`
R/autoClean.R	`85%`	:white_check_mark:	`138-139` `235-241` `369-370` `380-384`
R/autoFilter.R	`0%`	:x:	`27-430`
R/CensoredDataSuite.R	`88%`	:white_check_mark:	`48-49` `146` `176-177` `219-221` `307-308` `406-407` `420` `423` `431` `459-463` `466-467` `473-475` `492-494`
R/ContinuousDataFunctions.R	`53%`	:white_check_mark:	`151-152` `184` `189-259` `266-267` `290-328` `345-349` `352` `392-393` `483-547` `552-596` `603-610` `615-616` `655` `666` `672` `677-684` `709`
R/CriteriaComparison.R	`89%`	:white_check_mark:	`159-161` `166` `176` `223-241`
R/CriteriaMethods.R	`23%`	:white_check_mark:	`155` `175` `185` `191-250` `404-406` `422-424` `529-669` `675-711` `733-984` `1005-1173`
R/CriteriaRefTables.R	`0%`	:x:	`26-83`
R/DataDiscoveryRetrieval.R	`33%`	:white_check_mark:	`197` `206-211` `225-230` `240-245` `251` `255` `270-676` `690` `698` `700` `704-707` `710` `716` `718` `722` `724` `730` `734` `736` `746` `748` `752` `758` `760` `764` `766` `771` `773` `777` `783-786` `789` `801-809` `822-828` `857-865` `879-887` `907` `1001-1033` `1138-1145` `1236-1272` `1360-1363` `1415-1574`
R/DepthProfile.R	`0%`	:x:	`96-1472`
R/Figures.R	`0%`	:x:	`64-1555`
R/GeospatialFunctions.R	`18%`	:white_check_mark:	`70` `163-165` `176-180` `184` `239` `277` `321-548` `689-690` `696-699` `708-922` `927-1111` `1279-1290` `1307-1309` `1311` `1337` `1343-1387` `1414-1416` `1494-1578` `1589-2123` `2204` `2247` `2268-3742`
R/MaintenanceScheduled.R	`0%`	:x:	`42-349`
R/RequiredCols.R	`16%`	:white_check_mark:	`359-581`
R/ResultFlagsDependent.R	`63%`	:white_check_mark:	`59` `64` `94-98` `118-122` `220` `246-248` `265-267` `274` `290-301` `396` `403` `410` `419` `476` `482` `498-507` `575` `587-594` `616` `627-631` `699-787` `885` `934-942` `963` `967` `973-977`
R/ResultFlagsIndependent.R	`47%`	:white_check_mark:	`71` `77` `111-136` `242` `250` `257` `264` `269` `280` `352-353` `370-407` `496` `501` `508` `579-588` `599-614` `704` `709` `715` `792-972` `1022` `1040-1059` `1070-1073` `1177` `1181` `1224-1235` `1240` `1244-1247` `1313-1551`
R/Tables.R	`77%`	:white_check_mark:	`19-30` `86`
R/TADAGeospatialRefLayers.R	`0%`	:x:	`8-13`
R/TADARefTables.R	`84%`	:white_check_mark:	`75` `85-89`
R/Transformations.R	`92%`	:white_check_mark:	`71-72` `100` `190-196` `329-330` `396-397` `481-482` `557-558` `726-739`
R/UnitConversions.R	`81%`	:white_check_mark:	`128` `344` `351` `358` `365` `372` `379` `386` `393-394` `521-585` `609-646` `669` `709` `723-732` `913-915` `1005` `1062-1065` `1095`
R/Utilities.R	`51%`	:white_check_mark:	`28-32` `183` `199-200` `301-302` `306` `311` `384` `486-494` `556-557` `566` `623-624` `662-666` `764-765` `774-778` `783-784` `859-860` `872-873` `878` `893-896` `899-908` `912` `948-1241` `1267-1268` `1279-1280` `1340-1689` `1781-1813`
R/WQPWQXRefTables.R	`63%`	:white_check_mark:	`21-78` `102` `112` `118-120` `132` `154` `164` `170-172` `247` `269` `279` `285-287` `371` `392` `402` `408-412` `556` `578` `588` `594-596` `613` `637` `647` `653-655` `760-963`

Minimum allowed coverage is 10%

Generated by :monkey: cobertura-action against cef7567f8d99d3969c82edd3b3bccb7c9865d1c3

Oct 14 '25 20:10 github-actions[bot]

Note: tests pass, vignettes fail to build. Piping was not updated outside of .r files in R dir (i.e., not updated in vignettes), suggesting the failure is due to an update to the package code, either (1) used to build this one, (2) potentially not covered by tests (22%), or (3) not related to changes on this branch?

Oct 14 '25 20:10 jbousquin

See issue 642 for files (n=8) that need to be revisited to resolve more involved piping (e.g., placeholders)

Oct 15 '25 20:10 jbousquin

@mhweber would you recommend we merge this in now and continue to work on the more involved piping in a separate branch/PR? Or continue to add updates to this PR?

See: https://github.com/USEPA/EPATADA/issues/642 (e.g., placeholders)

Oct 16 '25 18:10 cristinamullin

@mhweber would you recommend we merge this in now and continue to work on the more involved piping in a separate branch/PR? Or continue to add updates to this PR?

See: #642 (e.g., placeholders)

@cristinamullin @jbousquin I think continuing to add remaining updates to this PR to finalize conversion of piping would be the way to go - I can try to take a look at remaining ones @jbousquin has pointed out today and tomorrow

Oct 16 '25 19:10 mhweber