Visual-Inertial-Synchronization-Hardware
Visual-Inertial-Synchronization-Hardware copied to clipboard
Have you test it in real applications?
Dear authors' Thanks for this great work, I would like to know if you had tested this system on a real operation robot?
Thanks China
sorry for the late reply. We have test it on Vins-mono and you should estimate the td to get good performance.
---Original--- From: "SebastienFerrero"[email protected] Date: Thu, Jun 13, 2019 10:27 AM To: "TurtleZhong/Visual-Inertial-Synchronization-Hardware"[email protected]; Cc: "Subscribed"[email protected]; Subject: [TurtleZhong/Visual-Inertial-Synchronization-Hardware] Have you test it in real applications? (#1)
Dear authors' Thanks for this great work, I would like to know if you had tested this system on a real operation robot?
Thanks China
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub, or mute the thread.
@TurtleZhong Thanks for your reply , what do you mean by 'td'? Bests
@TurtleZhong Thanks for your reply , what do you mean by 'td'? Bests
‘td’ means the time offset between your camera and IMU, a param that can be estimated in VINS-MONO. you can find it in https://github.com/HKUST-Aerial-Robotics/VINS-Mono in readme 5.4.
Extended from this topic, I'd like to ask if you use the implementation for calibration using kalibr
(https://github.com/ethz-asl/kalibr). If so, does the calibration result achieve good accuracy?